I think the odds against three in a row are 54,872:1. I haven’t ever seen this…even in Casablanca they only hit twice in a row…
To quote the movie “Are you sure this place is honest?”
5 Likes
if you found that back-to-back was more likely than random, then the best strategy would be to always repeat the number that just came up.
3 Likes
@Big_E_2 I actually did see that in person twice in my life in casino’s! Once in Tunica, MS and once in MI City, Indiana. I felt as if I was in the twilight zone.
3 Likes
I know just enough about programming to know that nothing in the code is truly random. Even the random command in code is not random. In real casinos, they work hard to make their equipment as random as mechanically possible, so it would be more rare to see repeaters. In CW, the code has to be based on something to help make it pseudo-Random. The more minute the differences in the beginning numbers used for the random generator, say perhaps a thousandth of a second versus a tenth of a second on the internal clock, the more likely the spin would generate a nearly random result. Someone with formal code training and experience on the job would know much more about it than that. Good luck and good source!
1 Like
Back-to-back wins: @Elanor I have noticed during my roulette games that fairly often the numbers do repeat within maybe five or six rounds on CW. I haven’t ever seen triples, as @Big_E_2 showed, but I have used a technique of betting on the last few numbers shown to good advantage in short play on CW. Sometimes, I walk away with more than I started and other times, my timing is far enough off that I chalk up the minor loss to the cost of doing business to complete a challenge.
1 Like
@CruisinPast , I tried out the repeating numbers technique on a challenge recently, and It worked on the fifth spin! Can’t say I enjoy roulette, but hitting the number so quickly made it a bit more palatable. Don’t think I’d bet the farm on this method, but it just might work for some folks on short play times.
1 Like